A Discussion About Grace...

A little more than 20 years ago, a debate among theologians began to intensify about the nature of the grace of God in the salvation of humanity. One view became known as "Lordship Salvation" (LS). This position is predicated upon a few central ideas:

First, LS claims that true faith (what they call "saving faith") in Christ involves not only belief in Christ's sacrifice on the cross, but also a commitment to submit to Christ as Master over every area of life. The idea is that "repentance" (which LS defines as "turning from sin toward God") is a necessary component of genuine faith - and that without such a commitment to turn from sin, a person is not exercising legitimate faith in Jesus. One common cliche popularized by this camp is "You cannot accept Jesus as Savior while rejecting Him as Lord." Sounds reasonable enough, doesn't it?

Secondly, LS asserts that in the life of all true believers, genuine faith will be "proven" by a lifestyle of increasing victory over sin, a demonstration of consistent obedience, and a track-record of obviously good works. Among the passages used to defend this idea are James 2:14-26 and Jesus' various statements in the Gospels related to "denying" or "dying to" oneself in order to come to Him.

On the other side of the debate, another view became popularly known as "Free Grace" theology (FG). This school of thought also emphasizes some core ideas about the nature of the Gospel proclaimed by Jesus and the Apostles.

In contrast to LS theology, FG theology affirms that Biblical faith in Christ is nothing more or less than simple "trust" or "confidence" that the Gospel is true and that it's promises apply to us personally the very moment we place our trust in this work of salvation Christ accomplished. FG advocates distinguish faith from "surrender to Christ's Lordship" on the grounds that adding mandatory results as a "litmus test" for whether or not one's faith is genuine is unbiblical and runs against the nature of grace itself - which is defined as God's unmerited favor received as a free gift on the basis of simply trusting in the promises of Christ.

Secondly, FG advocates insist that while "repentance" CAN and often DOES involve a turning from sin, we must be careful to define repentance Biblically. The Biblical definition of the verb "to repent" means literally "to change one's mind or perspective". It does NOT mean "to turn away from sin", although as I just mentioned, it could and often WILL include turning away from sin. Popular passages used to defend the FG position include John 3:16 and following, along with various passages in the Pauline Epistles which affirm that grace and the Law are two entirely different systems with unique purposes.

At one time I was a staunch, card-carrying member of the Lordship Salvation camp. Over the years, and with many reasons brought about through careful study of the Scriptures, I have journeyed toward the Free Grace camp in my understanding of the Gospel. Some of the primary voices among the LS camp include John MacArthur, R.C Sproul and John Piper. Noteworthy advocates of the FG position include Zane Hodges, Charles Swindoll and Charles Ryrie.

While I respect each of the men I just mentioned in various ways, I am definitely thankful for the movement toward Free Grace theology that I have experienced as a believer and pastor. I cannot possibly go into all of those issues in this format, but I would be interested in knowing where you fit along this spectrum of thought. What exactly DOES it mean to have faith? What does repentance mean? And how do the two of these ideas fit together (if at all) in bringing about eternal life?

If you have non-combative ideas to share - stuff that you would be able to defend Scripturally and with respect to other viewpoints - I would love to hear from you. As Christians, we all believe that salvation is by grace through faith - but what exactly does that mean? Let's have a good discussion...