Stop Trying to Live for Jesus!

For quite a number of years, the idea behind the famous phrase "What Would Jesus Do?" has bothered me. I know it can seem quarrelsome to raise doubts about a beloved religious slogan that has gained such wide acceptance among Christians of all denominations, but allow me to explain...

The essence of the Christian life is not about living for Jesus. That's right. You read that correctly. The essence of the Christian life is about experiencing an exchanged life with Jesus. Because of the cross and resurrection, Jesus finished His mission to both fulfill the Law on your behalf AND provide the only payment worthy to absolve you from all the guilt of your sin. When we trust Christ as the Savior of our lives, our sin nature is exchanged for His new, righteous nature.

The Apostle Paul wrote emphatically, "I have been crucified with Christ, and I no longer live, but Christ lives in me. The life I now live in the body I live by faith in the Son of God who loved me and gave Himself for me" (Galatians 2:20). This reality is a world apart from the common models for "Christian growth" that we find in many churches today.

Growing as a follower of Jesus (also called Discipleship) is often centered upon that popular question: "What Would Jesus Do?" We are told - in one way or another - that in any given situation we have choices to make. While this is not entirely false, the emphasis is upon asking ourselves what we envision Jesus would do in a similar situation and then attempting to "mimic" that behavior or "measure up" to that standard. Once we've concocted a visualization of what we think Jesus would do in the situation, we are then told to try our best to copy Him. "Die to yourself", we are often told. "Take up your cross", we are frequently reminded. But is this really how we are supposed to become "more like Jesus"? The New Testament proposes another way.

Every explicit or implicit Biblical statement about the need to "die to yourself" came prior to Jesus' finished work on the cross. As Jesus made these kinds of statements, He was pointing out the high cost involved in being the kind of person God's holiness demands - pure, righteous and perfect. Ministering under the Old Covenant, Jesus was routinely seeking to point His audience toward the New. He would often elevate God's standards to a level even higher than they were commonly understood. For example, in his famous Sermon on the Mount He pointed out that to be lustful was to be guilty of adultery and to be angry is to be guilty of murder. These statements (and dozens of others) were designed to drive His audience in desperation to faith in the cross He was about to endure, for He said clearly that "Unless you righteousness surpasses that of the Pharisees, you cannot enter the Kingdom..."

Knowing that we could never perfectly attain to these standards, Jesus wanted us to understand that there was only ONE Person in the universe who could actually live the Christian life - and that Person was Him. He fulfilled every requirement of God's Law by living on our behalf the perfect life we couldn't live because of our sin nature. Often in our admirable efforts to emphasize that Christ died in our place, we forget to place equal emphasis on the fact that unless He had first LIVED in our place - His dying would have been meaningless. When we place our faith in Christ and His finished work, He exchanges His perfection for our sin nature. We are counted as being crucified with Him AND resurrected into new life with Him.

When we ask ourselves "What Would Jesus Do?" as a motivation for successfully navigating the moral dilemmas of our daily lives, we completely miss the point. The REAL question is "What WILL Jesus Do" through me in any given situation? This subtle but significant shift in thinking makes all the difference in the world. My old life has been exchanged with Christ's new life in me. Accepting that I have been crucified with Him is an ongoing act of faith. I still have a "flesh" - a part of me that has been conditioned to handle life's challenges independently from God. But my spirit has been made completely new and is fully surrendered to the things of God.

The battle lies in the realm of the soul (mind, will and emotions). When, for example, I am tempted to sin - my spirit desires obedience to God while my flesh desires to satisfy that sinful craving. The solution, then is not to ask "What would Jesus do?" and then try to white-knuckle my way through the battle. The solution is to allow my mind to be transformed by the reality that when I "walk by the Spirit, I will not gratify the desires of the flesh." Paul never told us to "die to sin." That was a pre-cross message. New Covenant believers are told to "reckon yourselves dead to sin but alive to God in Christ Jesus" (Romans 6).

To "reckon" means to "consider" or to "accept as fact" (by faith) that something is true. I hear many pastors and leaders lamenting the fact that so many within the church continue to live their lives no differently than the world. They say that the problem is that people are not "submitted enough" to Christ's Lordship - or that people are not being taught to "die to self." Yet, those realities - in my opinion - are merely symptomatic (not causal) of the real problem. The real problem is that we've been operating from the wrong perspective.

Maturity is a fruit of security - not vice-versa. Most discipleship models contend that if you live obediently to God, He will bless your life, you'll feel closer to Him, etc. This is totally antithetical to the core of the New Testament Epistles. It is only as we become increasingly secure in the unconditional grace and blessing of God toward us in Christ (Ephesians 1-3) that real maturity can gradually emerge (Ephesians 4-6). People will rip passages like James 2:14-26 completely out of context in order to manipulate Christians into becoming so morbidly concerned with how much "fruit" they are producing that they begin to question the legitimacy of their faith and their security in Christ. Whenever the focus is placed upon our conditional performance rather than on the unconditional promises of Christ and the Gospel - we are in for a neurotic journey of legalism and frustration.

Jesus said, "Come to me, all you who are wary and heavy-burdened - and I will give you rest for your souls." This does not seem to be the experience of many Christians I know. Like the Pharisees of old, many teachers are putting burdens on people's backs that Jesus has already born for us as He lived and died in our place. The pressure to perform is now OFF.

We should not be asking "What Would Jesus Do?" Instead, we can wake up every morning with a much more exciting question: "What WILL Jesus do through me today?" Christianity is not about YOU trying your best to live for Jesus. It's about Jesus living His supernatural life through you! When this becomes the restful obsession of one's life - obedience becomes a by-product of resting in His irreversibly finished work on our behalf! That's what it means, essentially, to live the Christian life: Christ in you, the hope of glory! I challenge you to stop trying to live for Him and begin resting in Him instead. Only then can you allow Him to live the Christian life through you!

Thinking About the Tucson Tragedy...

In light of last weekend's tragic violence in Tuscon, Arizona, I have been praying for the families and churches in their efforts to comfort the grieving. Whenever such an event strikes a community, there are seldom any clear answers for the pain and suffering of those involved.

As I have been following the media coverage, I have noticed some typical trends. First, many on the political left began to insinuate or outright state that the harsh anti-government rhetoric coming from some conservatives was to blame. Then, after more information revealed that such a connection could NOT be made, conservatives struck back by pointing out that according to mounting evidence, it seemed that the shooting suspect was more in line with extreme non-conservative ideology (Communism, atheism, nihilism, etc.).

Of course, the gun-control activists immediately began to shout about the need for tougher gun laws - to which the other side reminded the public that guns cannot be blamed for killing people any more than cars can (a perspective with which I happen to agree). And in the midst of it all, there is a (probably needful) debate now raging about whether our society is addressing issues of mental illness as seriously as we should be.

I'm not able to say anything authoritatively about that last issue, but what this entire tragedy has demonstrated to me above all else is the call for the Body of Christ to be more alert to the struggles of people around us. I believe that Jared Loughner should be held responsible for his actions and punished to the full extent of the Law. At the same time, I am bothered by the increasing evidence which suggests that Tuscon might have been spared of Jared's actions had family, friends, law-enforcement and the Body of Christ taken his unusual temperament more seriously.

It causes me to do a real gut-check and ask myself - are there people in my life that I intentionally avoid because they are too "weird" or "inconvenient" for me? Are there blind-spots in my day-to-day hurriedness which cause me to miss out on opportunities to minister to those who are struggling spiritually or psychologically? I'm almost positive that the answer is at least SOMETIMES yes. What about you? Any thoughts or comments are welcome....

The Rotten Fruit of Religion

This week I'm preaching on one of the most famous passages in the Bible - Genesis 3. I love this passage for many reasons, not the least of which is because it establishes both our need for AND God's promise of the Gospel of Jesus Christ. One of the major elements of the passage which is overlooked by some readers is verse 7 - is where Adam and Eve realize they are naked for the very first time and they end up sewing fig leaves together in order to cover themselves.

I've heard many people say that after Adam and Eve rebelled - we immediately see the sin of murder (referring to Genesis 4 and the story of Cain and Abel). While that tragic event is indeed a significant development in the story of the fall of humanity - it is NOT the first sin following the fall. In fact, the first sin after their initial rebellion was NOT more blatant rebellion. Far from it! In reality, it was a sad turning to RELIGION. Yes, that's right, religion!

Rather than running into the loving arms of a forgiving God in the quest for restoration, Adam and Eve tried to cover their own shame by the work of their own hands. This is classic religious legalism in its rawest form. And what was the result of the very first act of religion recorded in the Bible? The same thing legalism creates today, including...

1) Secrecy - Adam knew he had sinned, so he "hid" from God

2) Fear - Adam told God, "I was afraid, so I hid"

3) Judgmentalism - Adam blamed Eve (and he even tried to blame God for giving creating Eve), and Eve blamed the serpent

I'm sure there are more items I could add to the list, but these three illustrate my point very well. Secrecy, fear and judgmentalism are all evidence of the rotten fruit of religion. If you or someone you know is part of a religious movement where these realities exist, perhaps it is time to consider whether Jesus had something better in mind for you when He hung on the cross to forgive ALL of your sins. The Apostle Paul wrote: "It is for freedom that Christ has set us free. Stand firm then, and do not let yourselves be burdened again by a yoke of slavery" (Galatians 5:1).

If you are striving to "live for God" by surrendering yourself to rigorous disciplinary techniques, harsh self-denial or other shame-based, guilt-ridden approaches, why not be done with that and instead trust in the finished work of Jesus Christ once and for all? Why wallow in that pit of self-deprecation when Jesus has offered to live His supernatural life through you, rather than you striving to "live for Him"? This subtle but crucial shift in your understanding can make all the difference in the world as you begin to realize that true godliness comes as the result of RESTING in Him rather than WRESTLING against yourself.

Throw Your Resolutions out the Window?

So its been a couple of months since I last posted on Raw and Relevant. Tonight is New Years and I enjoyed the evening celebrating with some close friends and family. One of the things I love about New Years is that it represents new beginnings and fresh starts - things for which every human being longs.

The down side to New Years is that it is only available once every 365 days. In ancient Israel, the Hebrews celebrated Yom Kippur - the Day of Atonement - at which time the High Priest would make an elaborate annual sacrifice on behalf of the sins of the entire nation. What a day of celebration following this event - to know and rest assured that sins were atoned for! And yet - the book of Hebrews tells us that this annual event was only a shadow of things to come, when Jesus Christ would offer Himself as the once-for-all sacrifice for the sins of the whole world (see Hebrews 10:1-18)!

As wonderful as it is to celebrate the newness of a brand new year - it pales in comparison to the daily celebration we can experience as believers in a God whose mercies are new EVERY single morning (Lamentations 3:22-23)! No longer in need of a human priest to whom we confess our sins - we can rest assured of Christ's complete cleansing from the moment we first believe in Him. When we confess our sins (i.e. become Christians) - He is faithful and just to forgive us our sins (past, present and future) and to cleanse us from ALL unrighteousness. How much unrighteousness? That's right - ALL.

If you are into making New Years resolutions (I am not) then how about this one above all others? Resolve to respond to the invitation offered by the author of Hebrews to "struggle to enter into that rest" that Jesus has provided for us through His all-sufficient death, burial and resurrection. Rather than making promises you probably won't keep - or attempting to "turn over a new leaf" - how about committing to learning to REST in the completed work of Christ? He has fulfilled the Law on your behalf, so the pressure to perform is now OFF! Instead of striving to live a righteous life by rigid discipline or self-effort, how about abandoning yourself to the supernatural life of Jesus Christ living through you as the temple of His Holy Spirit (1 Corinthians 6:19-20)? It's a much more joyous way to live - and its the only real way to begin experiencing lasting peace and holy living.

In essence, I'm saying "Throw your resolutions out the window" in favor of the life-giving Spirit of Christ living HIS otherwise impossible-to-live life through you! Instead of striving to become a "better person" - take Jesus up on His offer to "Come to me, all you who are weary and heavy-burdened, and you will find rest for your souls"! How ironic that God knows that "resting" in him would be a "struggle" for us (Hebrew 4:11)! How ironic that being a disciple of Jesus is more about giving up than it is about trying harder! Jesus' approach is always unconventional, usually surprising, and NEVER dull or mundane. What do you think? Isn't it about time you tried it HIS way?

Happy New Year 2011!!!

Contradictory Christianity

Have you ever noticed how sometimes well-meaning Christians say contradictory things? For example, sometimes in gatherings where multiple people are praying, a person will pipe up and say something like, "Lord, You said that whenever two or more are gathered together in Your name that You will be in the midst of them. Well Lord, there are more than two of us here, so we know that You are with us!"

I remember hearing people quote those words from the Gospel of Matthew and thinking to myself, "So what does THAT imply? Does that mean that Jesus ISN'T at the center of our prayer experience if at least TWO people aren't praying together? What if I'm praying by myself? Is Jesus ignoring me until I round up a partner?"

I'll let you sit on that one for awhile. I do have an opinion - but I want to raise an issue about a contradiction which is infinitely more important than the example above. The issue I'd like to discuss relates to God's forgiveness for us through Christ. For years I grew up hearing preachers talk about how we are eternally "forgiven" of all of our sins (past, present and future) when we receive Christ and become children of God. I agree with this as a basic tenet of genuine Christianity.

Yet, on the other hand I grew up being told that Christians must confess their sins to God on a regular basis in order to find forgiveness for individual sins. The idea was to "keep short accounts" with God so as to "maintain close fellowship" (whatever that meant). Most of the rationale was based on 1 John 1:9, which says "If we confess our sins, He is faithful and just to forgive us our sins and to purify us from all unrighteousness." Now, you can see where the double-talk comes in. If I am eternally forgiven of all my sins the moment I receive Christ as Savior - why must I continually confess my sin in order to receive forgiveness and purification?" Is that REALLY what 1 John 1:9 is saying?

Please feel free to chime in with your thoughts...

Burning the Koran in the Name of Christ?

Most of you have seen the reports about how Rev. Terry Jones and his church in Gainesville, FL. are sponsoring a “Koran burning” on September 11, 2010. This kind of behavior is – in my opinion – nothing more than a disgraceful, cheap stunt done in a manner that is both anti-Christian and anti-American. This week I join our Secretary of State and other political and religious leaders in their condemnation of the actions of this church.

In 1790, George Washington wrote to a synagogue in Newport, RI that “This country will give to bigotry no sanction, to persecution no assistance.” As a Christian, I am obviously in disagreement with some of the teachings of the Koran as I understand them. Yet as both a Christian and an American, I believe in religious liberty and tolerance of those I disagree with. And I also benefit greatly by their treatment of me in similar fashion. I may not choose to worship alongside of a person from another faith, but I will rigorously stand alongside of them in defense of their right to worship as they see fit.

In his condemnation of the terror attacks on 9/11, Reverend Jones is now lowering himself to a level on par with the very terrorists he condemns. In fact, his actions are eerily reminiscent of a former terrorist regime known as the Nazis. I'm no genius, but I think a good rule of thumb is that if Hitler practiced it, it's probably something we should avoid! Repaying evil for evil is not only unbiblical, but extremely unwise in a case like this. In addition to his actions bringing reproach to the Name of Christ, Rev. Jones and his church are also putting many innocent people at risk by inciting more violence against Americans, U.S. Troops and peaceful Christians, Jews and Muslims worldwide.

All legitimate Christians should wholeheartedly repudiate the unfortunate and despicable actions of this pastor and his church. Please pray with me as we remember those lost on 9/11, that this church and its sympathizers will be largely ignored and that the radicals who might respond to this Koran burning with violence will not be successful in the needless taking of more innocent lives.

A Discussion About Grace...

A little more than 20 years ago, a debate among theologians began to intensify about the nature of the grace of God in the salvation of humanity. One view became known as "Lordship Salvation" (LS). This position is predicated upon a few central ideas:

First, LS claims that true faith (what they call "saving faith") in Christ involves not only belief in Christ's sacrifice on the cross, but also a commitment to submit to Christ as Master over every area of life. The idea is that "repentance" (which LS defines as "turning from sin toward God") is a necessary component of genuine faith - and that without such a commitment to turn from sin, a person is not exercising legitimate faith in Jesus. One common cliche popularized by this camp is "You cannot accept Jesus as Savior while rejecting Him as Lord." Sounds reasonable enough, doesn't it?

Secondly, LS asserts that in the life of all true believers, genuine faith will be "proven" by a lifestyle of increasing victory over sin, a demonstration of consistent obedience, and a track-record of obviously good works. Among the passages used to defend this idea are James 2:14-26 and Jesus' various statements in the Gospels related to "denying" or "dying to" oneself in order to come to Him.

On the other side of the debate, another view became popularly known as "Free Grace" theology (FG). This school of thought also emphasizes some core ideas about the nature of the Gospel proclaimed by Jesus and the Apostles.

In contrast to LS theology, FG theology affirms that Biblical faith in Christ is nothing more or less than simple "trust" or "confidence" that the Gospel is true and that it's promises apply to us personally the very moment we place our trust in this work of salvation Christ accomplished. FG advocates distinguish faith from "surrender to Christ's Lordship" on the grounds that adding mandatory results as a "litmus test" for whether or not one's faith is genuine is unbiblical and runs against the nature of grace itself - which is defined as God's unmerited favor received as a free gift on the basis of simply trusting in the promises of Christ.

Secondly, FG advocates insist that while "repentance" CAN and often DOES involve a turning from sin, we must be careful to define repentance Biblically. The Biblical definition of the verb "to repent" means literally "to change one's mind or perspective". It does NOT mean "to turn away from sin", although as I just mentioned, it could and often WILL include turning away from sin. Popular passages used to defend the FG position include John 3:16 and following, along with various passages in the Pauline Epistles which affirm that grace and the Law are two entirely different systems with unique purposes.

At one time I was a staunch, card-carrying member of the Lordship Salvation camp. Over the years, and with many reasons brought about through careful study of the Scriptures, I have journeyed toward the Free Grace camp in my understanding of the Gospel. Some of the primary voices among the LS camp include John MacArthur, R.C Sproul and John Piper. Noteworthy advocates of the FG position include Zane Hodges, Charles Swindoll and Charles Ryrie.

While I respect each of the men I just mentioned in various ways, I am definitely thankful for the movement toward Free Grace theology that I have experienced as a believer and pastor. I cannot possibly go into all of those issues in this format, but I would be interested in knowing where you fit along this spectrum of thought. What exactly DOES it mean to have faith? What does repentance mean? And how do the two of these ideas fit together (if at all) in bringing about eternal life?

If you have non-combative ideas to share - stuff that you would be able to defend Scripturally and with respect to other viewpoints - I would love to hear from you. As Christians, we all believe that salvation is by grace through faith - but what exactly does that mean? Let's have a good discussion...